Reframing a shirt as teamwearDesigning event apparel for real-world use
The brief
1
A regional member office needed a new set of sports T-shirts for an annual multi-association sports event and future member activities. The prior year's shirts used a straightforward logo-on-a-shirt treatment: not badly executed, but by the local team's own description, "unremarkable."
Several competing professional associations were doing the same thing at the same event, so the branding was disappearing into a sea of identical logo tees.
The challenge
2
The initial ask was narrow: make this one event's shirt stand out more. Working with the designer, I proposed widening the brief: treat the shirt as evergreen apparel that could be worn well beyond the single event, both to extend brand visibility afterward and to get more value out of a budget that was being spent regardless.
The team liked the reframing, but it introduced new constraints: the design now had to read clearly in fast-moving, photo-heavy group settings; carry messaging that wouldn't feel tied to one specific event; and work as something people would actually want to wear again, not just promotional merchandise. Short-sleeve and sleeveless versions also needed separate logo placement, since the sleeveless cut had nowhere to put a sleeve-mounted logo without it competing with the main text.
The approach
3
The design direction came out of a personal observation: as a regular runner, I knew that run clubs and event apparel solve the same visibility problem. Sponsor and club names need to be legible at a distance and in motion, not just readable up close.
I applied that same logic here, treating the shirt as teamwear rather than static branded merchandise. That meant a front/back hierarchy: a short, legible line up front with the strongest brand presence, and a supporting line on the back with lower visual priority. The designer and I worked within the organization's existing palette, no major brand deviation; we used the shirt's reflective material and dynamic typography to bring it closer to contemporary athletic-wear conventions.
Midway through the project, the local team asked to swap in a broader recruitment headline instead of the copy already in progress. I pushed back: that framing described the qualification rather than prompting action, and it read as an abstract statement, rather than a moving call-to-action on a shirt seen for two seconds at a distance. A parallel request to add more detailed program information risked the same problem: it belonged in a brochure, not a shirt.
The compromise I worked out with the designer was to keep the shorter, benefit-led headline but give it more visual prominence, so it did double duty as both a recognizable product hook and a curiosity-driven call-to-action. The team accepted that direction and the project moved forward on that basis.
Impact
4
The shirts read clearly in motion and in group event photography, brand presence held up in both close-up and wide event shots, and the design sat naturally within a sportswear context rather than announcing itself as promotional clothing.
Members and staff wore them comfortably during a competitive, physically active event: the real test of whether "evergreen teamwear" actually worked as intended, beyond just looking good in a mockup.